Global Flourishing Study

Follow the Study

Sign up to receive our email updates.

Email

About the Study

  • Overview
  • Team

Explore

  • Research Explorer
  • Chat
  • Videos

Resources

  • In the News
  • Reports
  • Flourishing Lenses
  • Access the Data

Funding Partners

The Global Flourishing Study is generously funded by the David & Carol Myers Foundation, Fetzer Institute, the John Templeton Foundation, the Paul Foster Family Foundation, Templeton Religion Trust, Templeton World Charity Foundation, Well-Being for Planet Earth, and the Well Being Trust.

Partners

Baylor University Institute for Global Human FlourishingGallupCenter for Open ScienceThe Human Flourishing Program – Harvard University
© Baylor University · 2026·Terms·Privacy
Global Flourishing Study
  • Research Explorer
  • Chat
  • Videos
Back to Research Explorer
Character & Virtue202511 min read

The Surprising Childhood Roots of a Generous Life

Childhood predictors of charitable giving and helping across 22 countries in the Global Flourishing Study

Notable finding

Childhood religious attendance linked to 33% more adult charitable giving.

By
Nakamura, Julia S. et al.
Participants
202,898
Countries
22
Journal
Scientific Reports
DOI
10.1038/s41598-024-77950-1
Chat with paper
Chat with paper
§1

Key Takeaways

01

Both positive childhood experiences, like attending religious services, and negative ones, like experiencing abuse, are linked to a higher likelihood of giving to charity and helping strangers in adulthood.

02

The relationship between childhood experiences and adult generosity varies significantly across different countries, with the same factor sometimes predicting more giving in one nation and less in another.

03

Childhood factors that predict donating money to charity are not always the same as those that predict helping a stranger.

§2

Why It Matters

This research matters because it helps us understand where generosity comes from—and that understanding could one day guide programs and policies that encourage people to give and help more. Prosocial behaviors like charitable giving and helping strangers benefit communities and are tied to better health and well-being for the people who do them.

The impulse to help can grow from our brightest moments, but also from our darkest experiences.

The finding that childhood adversity sometimes goes hand-in-hand with more generosity challenges simple assumptions. It suggests that hardship can, in some cases, deepen empathy and compassion. At the same time, the strong and consistent pattern around childhood religious service attendance points to one clear area where families and communities may be planting seeds of generosity early on.

The large variation between countries also matters. It tells us that the same childhood experience can lead to different outcomes depending on cultural context. Policies aimed at fostering generosity may need to be tailored to specific societies rather than treated as one-size-fits-all. Understanding these patterns is a first step toward building more generous, connected communities worldwide.

This research matters because it helps us understand where generosity comes from—and that understanding could one day guide programs and policies that encourage people to give and help more. Prosocial behaviors like charitable giving and helping strangers benefit communities and are tied to better health and well-being for the people who do them. The finding that childhood adversity sometimes goes hand-in-hand with more generosity challenges simple assumptions. It suggests that hardship can, in some cases, deepen empathy and compassion. At the same time, the strong and consistent pattern around childhood religious service attendance points to one clear area where families and communities may be planting seeds of generosity early on. The large variation between countries also matters. It tells us that the same childhood experience can lead to different outcomes depending on cultural context. Policies aimed at fostering generosity may need to be tailored to specific societies rather than treated as one-size-fits-all. Understanding these patterns is a first step toward building more generous, connected communities worldwide.

The impulse to help can grow from our brightest moments, but also from our darkest experiences.

§3

The Story

What makes someone generous when they grow up? Researchers asked this question using survey data from over 200,000 people across 22 countries. They looked at 11 different childhood experiences (like how close people felt to their parents, whether their family struggled financially, if they experienced abuse, whether they felt like an outsider, and how often they attended religious services at age 12) to see which ones lined up with two generous behaviors in adulthood: donating money to charity and helping strangers.

Some of the most generous adults were those who faced significant hardship and felt like outsiders as children.

Some findings were expected. People who attended religious services more often as kids tended to give and help more as adults. Those who grew up in families that lived comfortably financially were a bit more likely to donate to charity later. And people who had a good relationship with their father gave a little more to charity.

But other findings were surprising. People who experienced physical or sexual abuse as children were actually more likely to give to charity and help strangers as adults, not less. The same was true for people who felt like outsiders in their own families growing up. Researchers think this might reflect something called "altruism born of suffering": when people who go through hard times develop deeper empathy and a stronger desire to help others. Another interesting pattern: charitable giving went up with age, but helping strangers went down after age 60.

This may be because older adults have more money to give but less physical mobility to help people they don't know. The results also varied a lot by country. Something that predicted generosity in one place sometimes had the opposite effect somewhere else. For example, having divorced parents was linked to more charitable giving in Germany and India, but less giving in the United States and Israel. Overall, the study suggests that generosity in adulthood has many roots in childhood, and some of those roots are surprising. Both positive experiences, like attending religious services, and painful ones, like feeling left out, may shape whether we give and help later in life.

Figure
1.33x
Childhood Religious Attendance

Adults who attended religious services at least weekly at age 12 were 1.33 times more likely to donate to charity than those who never attended as children.

Figure
11%
Impact of Childhood Abuse

Experiencing physical or sexual abuse in childhood was associated with an 11% higher likelihood of both donating to charity and helping a stranger in adulthood.

Figure
-29%
Helping Strangers by Age

Compared to young adults aged 18-24, those aged 80 and older were 29% less likely to have helped a stranger in the past month.

Figure
2.2x
Religious Giving in Japan

In Japan, adults who attended religious services at least weekly as children were 2.2 times more likely to donate to charity compared to those who never attended.

Figures
1.33x
Childhood Religious Attendance

Adults who attended religious services at least weekly at age 12 were 1.33 times more likely to donate to charity than those who never attended as children.

11%
Impact of Childhood Abuse

Experiencing physical or sexual abuse in childhood was associated with an 11% higher likelihood of both donating to charity and helping a stranger in adulthood.

-29%
Helping Strangers by Age

Compared to young adults aged 18-24, those aged 80 and older were 29% less likely to have helped a stranger in the past month.

2.2x
Religious Giving in Japan

In Japan, adults who attended religious services at least weekly as children were 2.2 times more likely to donate to charity compared to those who never attended.

§4

Reader Questions

Cite

Research Details
& Citation

Chat with this paper
Published
2025
Journal
Scientific Reports
Participants
202,898
Countries
22
Cite this paper
Nakamura, J. S., Woodberry, R. D., Weziak-Bialowolska, D., Kubzansky, L. D., Shiba, K., Padgett, R. N., Johnson, B. R., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2025). Childhood predictors of charitable giving and helping across 22 countries in the Global Flourishing Study. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77950-1
Tags
charitable-givingpromoting-goodchildhoodreligion-spiritualitycross-cultural
Keep reading

More from this lens

View all research
The Surprising Global Map of Generosity
Video
Character & Virtue

The Surprising Global Map of Generosity

Globally, older people are more likely to donate money, but younger people are more likely to help a stranger.

2025·Scientific Reports·n=202,898
The Childhood Roots of Good Character
Video
Character & Virtue

The Childhood Roots of Good Character

What if the secret to being a good person is found in how you grew up?

2025·Scientific Reports·n=202,898
Who Tries to Do Good in the World?
Character & Virtue

Who Tries to Do Good in the World?

Surprisingly, people in wealthier, more individualistic countries often report a lower commitment to doing good than those in many developing nations.

2025·Scientific Reports·n=202,898
What Makes Us Help? The Surprising Roots of Volunteering
Video
Character & Virtue

What Makes Us Help? The Surprising Roots of Volunteering

Surprisingly, new research on 200,000 people finds that experiencing abuse or feeling like an outsider in childhood is linked to a higher likelihood of volunteering as an adult.

2025·Scientific Reports·n=202,898
The Childhood Seeds of Lifelong Hope
Video
Character & Virtue

The Childhood Seeds of Lifelong Hope

What if the hope you feel today was planted decades ago in your childhood?

2025·Applied Research in Quality of Life·n=202,898
Who Forgives? A Global Look at Letting Go
Character & Virtue

Who Forgives? A Global Look at Letting Go

In Nigeria, 92% of people say they often or always forgive, while in Türkiye, the number is just 41%.

2025·Scientific Reports·n=202,898