Despite a vast literature on subjective wellbeing (SWB), issues remain, including (a) debates around which concepts best represent it, (b) disjointed understanding of relevant factors, and (c) limited appreciation of cross-national variation regarding (a) and (b). We address these using data from the Global Flourishing Study on three constructs pertaining to evaluative SWB (life evaluation, life satisfaction, and, more ambiguously, happiness), examining associations with 15 childhood and demographic factors in 202,898 participants from 22 countries. Key findings include, for (a), life satisfaction being the best performing construct (in correlations with overall flourishing), (b) all factors being significantly associated with all constructs (with the largest variation for employment status among demographic factors and self-reported health among childhood factors), and (c) patterns varying substantively across countries (suggesting the general trends are not universal but differ according to local socio-cultural dynamics). The findings advance the methodological, socio-demographic, and cross-national understanding of evaluative SWB.
Researchers
Tim Lomas
Harvard University, Psychology
Hayami Koga
Harvard University, Epidemiology
Noah Padgett
Harvard University, Epidemiology
Eric Kim
University of British Columbia, Psychology
Christos Makridis
Stanford U. / Arizona State U. / University of Nicosia, Economics
Craig Gundersen
Baylor University, Economics
Matt Bradshaw
Baylor University, Sociology
Israel
Noémie Le Pertel
Harvard University, Business
Koichiro Shiba
Boston University, Epidemiology
Byron R. Johnson
Baylor University, Institute for Studies of Religion/Sociology